Multi-body loads, combined 3D center of gravity and simplified wrist analysis (J4/J5/J6) — structured technical pre-evaluation for demanding EOAT concepts.
Why the simple Quick Check often isn't enough
One body is rarely enough
Gripper, workpiece, tool-changer and sensors add up to a combined load that the simple Quick Check does not fully capture.
Center of gravity in three dimensions
On complex EOAT concepts the combined CoG rarely sits on the Z axis. X/Y offsets load J4 and J5 asymmetrically.
Know what is limiting
Whether payload, J4 moment or J5 inertia is the binding limit fundamentally changes the design concept.
What the advanced analysis delivers
Multi-body load model
Tool, workpiece, tool-changer, sensors — each body parameterised individually.
Combined 3D center of gravity
Aggregated X/Y/Z across all active load bodies, visible and traceable.
Simplified inertia
Principal-axis-based inertia aggregation for a first defensible estimate.
J4/J5/J6 axis assessment
Moments, inertias and utilization per wrist axis — explicitly reported.
Governing constraint
Shows explicitly which parameter currently dominates — payload, moment or inertia.
Assumptions & warnings
Explicit transparency about model limits and assumptions — a quality signal, not a defect.
What the advanced analysis looks like
Quick Check or Full Check — what fits when
Quick Check is enough when
- →Simple gripper-and-part combination (single body)
- →Center of gravity close to the Z axis
- →Fast sanity check in sales or engineering
- →Result is needed for internal discussion
- →Standard gripper without complex adapter plates
Full Check is recommended when
- →Multiple load bodies are combined (tool + adapter + sensor)
- →3D center of gravity matters (X/Y offset is not negligible)
- →J4/J5/J6 axis loading must be assessed explicitly
- →Utilization is close to the payload limit
- →An EOAT concept with a tool-changer is planned
- →A technical customer conversation needs a structured basis
Stage 3A engineering estimate. The tool provides a technical pre-evaluation — not a binding manufacturer release, not a substitute for load diagrams or full robot sizing.
What makes the Full Check defensible
Transparent about assumptions
Assumptions & warnings are explicitly visible. We tell you where the model simplifies — that is a quality signal, not a defect.
Vendor-neutral
The tool runs on a generic Stage 3A engine, adapter-ready for later vendor-specific profiles.
Clear scope
Full Check is not an integration release. What it delivers: structured technical clarity in early project phases.
Model limits and scope
Stage 3A engineering estimate. Not a binding manufacturer release, not a complete axis or path-dynamics simulation, not a safety qualification.
The inertia treatment is simplified (principal-axis logic). For safety-critical applications or normative releases, vendor-specific load curves and integration approvals are authoritative.
Optimised for pre-engineering and presales. For Phase 3B (vendor-specific profiles), the model will be extended in a future version.